how does tourism affect the following perspectives in Australia; cultural. environmental and social?
please help i can;’t find what i need.
Tourism has been accredited to be the corporation that nurtures the ideals of multiculturalism and encourages the manifestation of the still-tentative concept of the global village,’ by primarily allowing the appreciation of a place’s unique features to transverse all cultural and geographical boundaries. Furthermore, tourism has also diversified the economic, social and environmental aspects of the countries participating actively in its application. However, in spite of the indisputable advantages of tourism, the toll of its incorporation is already visible from the many disruptions, to the essential structure of economic institutions, the natural environment or that of local communities. It is crucial to note that in order for tourism to be sustainable on a long-term scale, careful and realistic management and must be integrated into its development to insure that the very assets attracting visitors on an international level are not destroyed by the follies of shortsighted government. Ultimately, the future of tourism must be accompanied by considerations that should not compromise the enjoyment of visitors but ones that must ensure the ecological diversity of Australia is not jeopardised by their demands.
Essentially, from a positive economic perspective, tourism has been a noteworthy factor behind the growth of Australia’s economy in recent years it contributes significantly to Australia’s Gross Domestic Product and creates extensive employment opportunities in a broad range of fields ranging from accommodation, transport, theme parks, tour operators, restaurants, museums and souvenir retailers. The implications of the immediate foreign income received from tourist expenditure are significant in the sense that they can be used to pay for the imports required to sustain a country’s basic demands.
However, these economic benefits are considerably diminished, and often become negligible, by the potential socioeconomic or environmental costs borne by the community from the activities of tourists. From this view, tourism becomes a burden the host country must sustain to preserve its natural environment and culture, in order to maintain its appeal to the international market. Furthermore, tourism is governed by global economic conditions and as demonstrated by the Asian economic crisis in the late 1990s, it is an industry that is essentially unreliable as a source for employment because of these erratic fluctuations. To a great extent, it also undermines Australia’s perceived elimination of gender discriminations, for only 36% of managers are women in tourism the majority are confined to the diminutive jobs of housekeeping, waiting or kitchen work. Ultimately, tourism becomes a vicious cycle of economic advantages and disadvantages between which a functional balance must be sought to avoid the irreversible consequences and devastating impacts poorly planned tourism is capable of wreaking.
Tourism also embodies significant implications for Australian society for its impacts likewise encompass from beneficial to detrimental developments. In support of tourism, many will argue that it initiates governmental action in improving the primary infrastructure and facilities of communities, in order to heighten their appeal to a foreign audience. For instance the 2000 Sydney Olympics equipped the city with international sporting stadiums, improved transport amenities and airport services.
However, the dominant social consideration is the social carrying capacity’, which is a measure of the maximum amount of tourist activity the host community is able to tolerate or sustain. An extreme case of the results of an excess of these tourism-orientated activities is the development of intense social hostility between cultures, with the host community regarding visitors as the usurpers of their original quality of life and the insensitive exploiters of Australia’s environmental beauty. The principles and lifestyles of the tourists become regarded as alien’ and because they are unable to assimilate into Australian society, they therefore erode the traditional values of Australian society.
Often, in a rush to develop the tourism industry, the social impacts are often overshadowed by the short-term gains, despite the fact that the essential composition of the host society will have a significant influence on the potential success of the development. Perhaps the greatest tragedy of the effects of tourism in Australia is its displacement of local residents, who are unable to afford the dramatic increases in the costs of living arising from the tourist prices for commodities. Tourism has also been associated with an increasing crime rate, from prostitution, gambling and drug abuse, and the tensions and dangers these factors create in local communities is equally responsible for resident displacement and subsequently, a general disintegration of community morale.
Tourists to Australia in recent years have become in
Think about it. What do tourists do for an area?
1) They expose the people there to other ideas, attitudes and cultures;
2) They bring more people to an area, damaging the area with more traffic and pollution;
3) They bring extra money to the area;
4) The people of the area like the extra money, so they cater for the tourists by:
4a) making new businesses, which adds extra opportunities to make money;
4b) improving the area, by cleaning up the extra pollution and repairing the environment;
5) The tourists might decide to move to the area
I’m sure you can expand on these ideas, and come up with some more!
References :
Tourism has been accredited to be the corporation that nurtures the ideals of multiculturalism and encourages the manifestation of the still-tentative concept of the global village,’ by primarily allowing the appreciation of a place’s unique features to transverse all cultural and geographical boundaries. Furthermore, tourism has also diversified the economic, social and environmental aspects of the countries participating actively in its application. However, in spite of the indisputable advantages of tourism, the toll of its incorporation is already visible from the many disruptions, to the essential structure of economic institutions, the natural environment or that of local communities. It is crucial to note that in order for tourism to be sustainable on a long-term scale, careful and realistic management and must be integrated into its development to insure that the very assets attracting visitors on an international level are not destroyed by the follies of shortsighted government. Ultimately, the future of tourism must be accompanied by considerations that should not compromise the enjoyment of visitors but ones that must ensure the ecological diversity of Australia is not jeopardised by their demands.
Essentially, from a positive economic perspective, tourism has been a noteworthy factor behind the growth of Australia’s economy in recent years it contributes significantly to Australia’s Gross Domestic Product and creates extensive employment opportunities in a broad range of fields ranging from accommodation, transport, theme parks, tour operators, restaurants, museums and souvenir retailers. The implications of the immediate foreign income received from tourist expenditure are significant in the sense that they can be used to pay for the imports required to sustain a country’s basic demands.
However, these economic benefits are considerably diminished, and often become negligible, by the potential socioeconomic or environmental costs borne by the community from the activities of tourists. From this view, tourism becomes a burden the host country must sustain to preserve its natural environment and culture, in order to maintain its appeal to the international market. Furthermore, tourism is governed by global economic conditions and as demonstrated by the Asian economic crisis in the late 1990s, it is an industry that is essentially unreliable as a source for employment because of these erratic fluctuations. To a great extent, it also undermines Australia’s perceived elimination of gender discriminations, for only 36% of managers are women in tourism the majority are confined to the diminutive jobs of housekeeping, waiting or kitchen work. Ultimately, tourism becomes a vicious cycle of economic advantages and disadvantages between which a functional balance must be sought to avoid the irreversible consequences and devastating impacts poorly planned tourism is capable of wreaking.
Tourism also embodies significant implications for Australian society for its impacts likewise encompass from beneficial to detrimental developments. In support of tourism, many will argue that it initiates governmental action in improving the primary infrastructure and facilities of communities, in order to heighten their appeal to a foreign audience. For instance the 2000 Sydney Olympics equipped the city with international sporting stadiums, improved transport amenities and airport services.
However, the dominant social consideration is the social carrying capacity’, which is a measure of the maximum amount of tourist activity the host community is able to tolerate or sustain. An extreme case of the results of an excess of these tourism-orientated activities is the development of intense social hostility between cultures, with the host community regarding visitors as the usurpers of their original quality of life and the insensitive exploiters of Australia’s environmental beauty. The principles and lifestyles of the tourists become regarded as alien’ and because they are unable to assimilate into Australian society, they therefore erode the traditional values of Australian society.
Often, in a rush to develop the tourism industry, the social impacts are often overshadowed by the short-term gains, despite the fact that the essential composition of the host society will have a significant influence on the potential success of the development. Perhaps the greatest tragedy of the effects of tourism in Australia is its displacement of local residents, who are unable to afford the dramatic increases in the costs of living arising from the tourist prices for commodities. Tourism has also been associated with an increasing crime rate, from prostitution, gambling and drug abuse, and the tensions and dangers these factors create in local communities is equally responsible for resident displacement and subsequently, a general disintegration of community morale.
Tourists to Australia in recent years have become in
References :